Self-Synchronising Timestamp-Keyed Encryption for LSB Image Steganography with In-Image Key Transport
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-4873Keywords:
Image steganography, Least Significant Bit, Timestamp-Based Key Generation, Key Transport, Image Quality Assessment, SteganalysisAbstract
Background: Hybrid schemes that combine lightweight encryption with image steganography are attractive for resource-constrained environments, but time-derived keys introduce an operational problem that is rarely addressed: sender and receiver must agree on the exact key material, and clock drift of a single second causes decryption to fail. Objective: This study proposes a timestamp-keyed substitution cipher whose key material travels inside the stego image itself, removing the need for clock synchronisation or a separate key channel while retaining session-dependent ciphertext variability. Methods: A position-dependent shift sequence is derived from timestamp components combined with a pre-shared key. The timestamp is written into a reserved header region of the cover image together with the ciphertext length, so that the receiver recovers the shift sequence directly from the stego image. Embedding uses single-bit least-significant-bit substitution on the 24-bit RGB pixel data of a BMP cover. The two key components serve distinct roles: the timestamp provides inter-session variability and is transmitted openly, whereas the pre-shared key provides confidentiality and is never transmitted. Results: Across five 512 × 512 USC-SIPI cover images, the scheme achieves a mean PSNR of 77.8575 ± 0.0699 dB and an NPCR of 0.106506 ± 0.00172% at a payload of 199 characters (0.002116 bpp), with message-level BER of zero across all tested payloads from 50 to 2000 characters, confirming lossless recovery. Ciphertext variability across different transmission times reaches 60.30%, compared with 0.00% for a fixed-shift Caesar baseline, and the byte-frequency entropy rises from 4.2417 to 5.8035. Chi-square and RS analysis do not separate the stego images from their covers, the RM and R−M curves differing by 0.071 percentage points. The complete pipeline executes in 3.606 ± 0.283 ms per image. Originality/Value: The contribution is the in-image transport of time-derived key material, which makes a time-keyed cipher deployable without synchronised clocks. The roles of the transmitted timestamp and the withheld pre-shared key are separated explicitly, and the security claims are bounded accordingly. Conclusion: The scheme offers a reproducible, self-contained mechanism for lightweight confidential data hiding. Its limitations, including the periodicity of the cipher and the absence of validation against learning-based steganalysis, are stated explicitly.Downloads
Published
2026-10-25
How to Cite
Rifqi, M., Ab Ghani , H., Karimah, H., & Santoso, H. (2026). Self-Synchronising Timestamp-Keyed Encryption for LSB Image Steganography with In-Image Key Transport. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing. https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-4873
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Rifqi, Hadhrami Ab Ghani , Hasyiya Karimah, Hadi Santoso

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).