Physics-Informed CNN–BiLSTM with Survival Analysis for Wind-Turbine SCADA Predictive Maintenance: A Controlled External Benchmark on Penmanshiel and Kelmarsh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-4148Keywords:
wind turbine, SCADA, physics-informed, statistical process control, survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards, Bayesian optimization, statistical learning, energy management, predictive maintenanceAbstract
Wind-turbine Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) predictive maintenance is evaluated under operational class imbalance, distribution shift across turbines and sites, and right-censored failure horizons. A leakage- safe turbine-holdout split with split-wise preprocessing is applied with external validation on two public Senvion cohorts (Penmanshiel, primary; Kelmarsh, secondary). The learning core is a physics-informed Convolutional Neural Network– Bidirectional LSTM (CNN–BiLSTM). Temporal convolutions provide local inductive bias. A bidirectional long short- term memory (LSTM) captures longer-range context. A drivetrain torque-balance residual enters the training loss (not as engineered inputs) as a physics-regularised penalty term. Eleven Statistical Process Control (SPC) indicators are concatenated onto the learned embedding for operator auditability. A Cox proportional-hazards head provides censoring- aware Remaining Useful Life (RUL) estimates. Across ten matched seeds with bootstrap 95% confidence intervals, receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) on the headline RUL classification label reaches 0.932 ± 0.008 (Penmanshiel) and 0.993 ± 0.002 (Kelmarsh) under the full-channel evaluation protocol. On the matched 48 h RUL band, tree ensembles reach ≈ 0.60 ROC-AUC (Table 5); that comparison is directional (label, prevalence, and feature-width asymmetry noted in the table footnote). Paired Wilcoxon tests against tree baselines under each cohort’s own lookahead label in Table 4 (not a matched-label head-to-head), yield W =0, Holm-corrected pHolm=0.00586, r=0.886 on both cohorts. A physics- weight ablation isolates a cohort-asymmetric physics contribution. Survival evaluation yields a pooled Harrell C-index of 0.719 (Cox on the encoder embedding with principal component analysis (PCA)-32 fit on training windows only, scored on held-out test windows). The inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW)-weighted Brier score is 0.082; Schoenfeld p=0.210 on the held-out test partition. A preliminary cross-original equipment manufacturer (OEM) transfer probe (non- headline protocol) returns near-chance area under the curve (AUC) (0.514 [0.491, 0.537] for Physics-informed+Cox). Cross- OEM domain adaptation remains insufficiently addressed in the present benchmark. False-positive rate (FPR)-budgeted alarms (≤ 5/turbine/year) link the detector to wind-farm energy management: fewer false stops raise time-based availability and reduce curtailment from unnecessary technician visits.Downloads
Published
2026-09-15
How to Cite
EL KETTANI, S. O., Hassani Zerrouk, M., Tikaoui, H., & Hassani Zerrouk, O. (2026). Physics-Informed CNN–BiLSTM with Survival Analysis for Wind-Turbine SCADA Predictive Maintenance: A Controlled External Benchmark on Penmanshiel and Kelmarsh. Statistics, Optimization & Information Computing. https://doi.org/10.19139/soic-2310-5070-4148
License
Copyright (c) 2026 SIDI OMAR EL KETTANI, Mohammed Hassani Zerrouk, Hicham Tikaoui, Omar Hassani Zerrouk

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).