On Quantile Credibility Estimators Under An Equal Correlation Structure Over Risks
Abstract
In traditional quantile credibility models, it is typically assumed that claims are independent across different risks. Nevertheless, there are numerous scenarios where dependencies among insured individuals can emerge, thereby breaching the independence assumption. This study focuses on examining the quantile credibility model and extending some established results within the context of an equal correlation structure among risks. Specifically, we compute the credibility premiums for both homogeneous and inhomogeneous cases utilizing the orthogonal projection method.References
Bailey, A.L., Credibility procedures - La Place’s Generalization of Bayes’ Rule and the Combination of Collateral Knowledge with Observed Data, . Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, 37, 7-23, 1950.
Bolance, C., M. Guillen and J. Pinquet , Time-varying credibility for frequency risk models: Estimation and tests for autoregressive specifications on the random effects, , Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 33, 273–282, 2003.
Buhlmann, H, ¨ Experience Rating and Credibility, ASTIN Bulletin, 4, 199-207,1967.
Buhlmann, H. and A. Gisler, ¨ A course in credibility theory and its application, Springer, The Netherlands.E. 2005 ,
Bozikas, Apostolos, and Pitselis Georgios., Incorporating crossed classification credibility into the Lee–Carter model for multipopulation mortality data, Insurance Mathematics and Economics 93: 353–68 , 2020.
Ebrahimzadeh, M., N. A. Ibrahim, A. A. Jemain and A. A. Kilicman, Claim dependence induced by common effects in hierarchical credibility models, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 42, 3373–3400, 2013.
Frees, E. W., V. R. Young and Y. Luo , A longitudinal date analysis interpretation of credibility models, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 24, 229–247,1999.
Frees, E. W., V. R. Young and Y. Luo, Case studies using panel data models, North American Actuarial Journal 5, 24–42,2001.
Gomez, E., P erez, J.M., V azquez, F.J., On the use of posterior regret 0–minimax actions to obtain credibility premiums, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 39, 115–121, 2006.
Goovaerts, M.J., Kaas, R., Heerwaarden, A.E., Bauwelinckx, T., Effective Actuarial Methods, In: Insurance Series, vol. 3. North Holland , 1990.
Heilmann, W., Decision theoretic foundations of credibility theory, 8,1:77–95, 1989.
Herbert, A. David, and Haikady N. Nagaraja, Order Statistics, 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley, 2003.
Herzog, T.N., Introduction to Credibility Theory,, 2nd ed. ACTEX Publications, Winsted, 1996.
Kahn, P.M., Credibility. Theory and Applications, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
Landsman, Z., Makov, U.E., Credibility evaluation for the exponential dispersion family, Insurance: Mathematics Economics 24, 23–29, 1999.
Mowbray, Albert H. , How extensive a Payroll exposure is necessary to give a dependable pure premium? Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society 1: 24–30,1914.
Parzen, Emanuel., Nonparametric statistical data modeling, Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 105–31,1979.
Pitselis, Georgios, Quantile crebibility models, Insurance Mathematics and Economics 52: 477–89,2013.
Pitselis, Georgios, Credible risk measures with applications in actuarial sciences and finance, Insurance Mathematics and Economics 70: 373–86, 2016.
Pitselis, Georgios, Risk measures in a quantile regression credibility framework with Fama/French data applications, Insurance Mathematics and Economics 74: 122–34,2017.
Pitselis, Georgios. Multi-stage nested classification credibility quantile regression model, Insurance Mathematics and Economics 92: 162–76, 2020.
Promislow, S.D., Young, V., Equity and exact credibility, Astin Bulletin 30 (1), 3–11,2000.
Purcaru,O.and M.Denuit On the dependence induced by frequency credibility models, Belgian Actuarial Bulletin 2, 73–79, 2002.
Purcaru,O. and M.Denuit Dependence in dynamic claim frequency credibility models, ASTIN Bulletin 2, 23–40,2003.
Wang, W.; Wen, L.; Yang, Z.; Yuan, Q Quantile Credibility Models with Common Effects, Risks 2020, 8, 100,
https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8040100
Wen, L.M., X. Y. Wu and X. Zhou, The credibility premiums for models with dependence induced by common effects, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 44, 19–25, 2009.
Wen, L. M. and W. L. Deng The credibility models with equal correlation risks, Journal of Systems Science and Complexity 24, 532–539, 2011.
Whitney, A.W., The Theory of Experience Rating, Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, 4, 274-92, 1918.
Yeo, K. L. and E. A. Valdez , Claim dependence with common effects in credibility models, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 38, 609–629, 2006.
Young, V., Credibility using semiparametric models and a loss function with a constancy penalty, Insurance: Mathematics Economics 26, 151–156, 2000.
Zhang, Qiang Chen, Ping. Credibility estimators with dependence structure over risks and time under balanced loss function: Credibility under balanced loss function, Statistica Neerlandica. 72. 10.1111/stan.12125,2018.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
